Recent Topics |
---|
![]() |
||||||
| ||||||
Moderated by: Spurno | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) - Members Personal Layouts. - Model Railway Layouts. - Your Model Railway Club | ||||||||||
Author | Post | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Petermac Admin ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
There you go see - keep everyone shut in to the Southern Region boundaries and they won't know there anything better "out there". Nowadays, they call it brain-washing ............ ![]() ![]() p.s. Those Merchant Navies and the "spam cans" might just be acceptable to the LNER....... ![]() ____________________ 'Petermac |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
peterm Full Member
My photos:
![]() |
That's all I remember as a yoof as well. ____________________ Cheers Pete. |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
BCDR Moderator ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Petermac wrote: There you go see - keep everyone shut in to the Southern Region boundaries and they won't know there anything better "out there". Well, the LNER did have plenty of experience in bad engineering design and retrospectively addressing fundamental mistakes. Big ends, valve gear, marine boilers come immediately to mind. Not that the GWR was immune from the bad designs of some of their early chief engineers. Luckily they made very few mistakes post-Dean. Must have been the clear air in the south. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Now now, no squabbling at the back there. We will all agree that all regions are equal. It's just that Southern is more equal than the others. Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Petermac Admin ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() What - from a region capable of producing the Q1 Class ........................ ![]() ![]() ____________________ 'Petermac |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
A beautiful utilitarian locomotive, Peter. Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Petermac Admin ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ____________________ 'Petermac |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
TeaselBay Novice
My photos:
![]() |
Stunning of set of photos, especially the last one.
____________________ Chris Teasel Bay Teasel Bay on Facebook |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Sol A modelling Moderator. ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Headmaster wrote: A beautiful utilitarian locomotive, Peter. I agree, being just beautiful does not beat being "beautiful & utilitarian" now back to my Irish diesels ..... ____________________ Ron NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline. |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
I haven't had much time in the loft as there are "more important" jobs to be done, apparently. However I did get to make and fix some detailing and figures to the quay. The fishermen are back as dawn breaks with the first catch of the day and enjoying a well earned brew and discussion before heading off again, this time to set some lobster traps...![]() Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
peterm Full Member
My photos:
![]() |
That scene is made more spectacular by the dawn sky. ____________________ Cheers Pete. |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
TeaselBay Novice
My photos:
![]() |
I agree, the sky adds to it! Your photoshop skills are improving. At first I thought you’d secretly poured the resin… the seabed is pretty convincing as it is (or at least on that photo!). ____________________ Chris Teasel Bay Teasel Bay on Facebook |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Claus Ellef Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
TeaselBay wrote: I agree, the sky adds to it! Your photoshop skills are improving.I thought the tide was out! Great photo 📸 ____________________ Cheers, Claus http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellef/ |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Phil.c Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Lovely picture Michael, to enhance it more, the sky works well but the gaps between the leaves in the distant trees show the original blue sky, if you create another layer and colour it the same as the pink sky, put this layer under your main layer, then, if you use a magic wand tool on the blue areas and cut, the pink will show through, alternatively, sample that pink, then with the brush tool paint over the blue areas. Here's a quick adjustment but it could be perfect given more time. I hope this helps? ![]() ![]() ____________________ Phil |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Petermac Admin ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
That's a fabulous shot Michael - it really could be real - love the weed on the harbour wall and the silt base. Very well done Sir !!! ![]() ____________________ 'Petermac |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Hi all, and thank you very much. I am still learning the software, I only noticed the blue of the trees when I posted it here, but thankyou for the advice Phil. I had a play but not sure I have got it exactly. But it's a little better. When it is a blue sky, the blue in the trees doesn't really show up.![]() Although I do have access to photoshop at school, the software I use at home is free open source, called photofiltre 7. I think someone on here recommended it once. It is pretty similar to photoshop, probably not as powerful, but more than enough for my small brain. I know there are other open source programs but they were too much for me, to much of a steep learning curve for what I need. Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Phil.c Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Much better, if you blow the image up and reduce the size of the tool, you get smaller areas through the leaves. ____________________ Phil |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Phil.c Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Michael, I've just had a go at your flowers, made by freezing a crayon and rubbing on sandpaper, I think that's what you did? Well, the crayon just stuck to the sandpaper? ____________________ Phil |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Hi Phil I'm fairly sure I scraped the crayons with a knife and then chopped them into smaller pieces. I'm sorry if I said, or gave the impression, that I sanded them. As an experiment, I also tried using a grater, but still needed the blade to chop them into finer pieces. Out of interest, I also tried the salt method, but my salt didn't really take the colour. Once I ground it, it tended to be more salt like than colourful like yours. Perhaps it was my impatience and I needed to wait longer in the colouring and subsequent grinding stages. Nowadays I use my own coloured flock, made from sponge intended for seating, or fine coloured powder if I need it to be very small. Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Headmaster Full Member ![]()
My photos:
![]() |
Petermac wrote: And the fair breeze blew, the white foam flew, the furrow followed free ....... Sorry Peter, I missed this post. Thank you, it is coming along and starting to take shape. The fish market is based on the actual buildings at the quay, which have been repurposed as restaurants or boutique shops in real life, but were almost certainly once the oyster sheds (and shrimp was a popular catch back in the day). I find it interesting that they are similar to the French ones. They even predate the oysters though, and there is evidence that they were corn and barley stores, although the history gets a bit sketchy further back in time. As they are listed buildings it means that modern users cannot really do much with them, which has meant some much needed investment in the town has been lost from enterprises which wanted to reconfigure the insides. I am all for protecting our buildings, but I'm not sure it should be at any cost. I mentioned I was involved in a restoration project and we wanted to make it a very green development - very energy efficient - and we were thwarted at every stage by the planning processes. Seems a bit daft to me. If water levels rise due to climate change, half the town, including the protected buildings, will be gone! Michael ____________________ Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) |
|||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 15008 Current time is 05:38 pm | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You are here: Your Model Railway Club > Model Railway Layouts. > Members Personal Layouts. > Kent Coast Railway (formerly Faversham Creek) | |||
You can type a quick reply to this topic here. Click in the box below to begin. Or to reply to an individual post, or to include images, attachments and formatted text, click the Quote or Reply buttons on each post above. To start a new topic in this forum, click the Start New Topic button below. To start a new topic in a different forum, click the Forum Jump drop-down list below. |
|
||
|
Back to top of page | ||
| |||
Problems with this web site? Please contact the Webmaster. |
All material submitted to this web site is the responsibility of the respective contributor. By submitting material to this web site you acknowledge that you accept full responsibility for the material submitted. |
Unless stated otherwise, all the material displayed on this web site, including all text, photographs, drawings and other images, is copyright and the property of the respective contributor. Registered members are welcome to use it for their own personal non-commercial modelmaking purposes. It must not be reproduced or re-published elsewhere in any form, or used commercially, without first obtaining the owner's express permission. |
The owner of this web site may edit, modify or remove any content at any time without giving notice or reason. © 2008 |
Recent Topics | Back to top of page | |
Powered by Copyright © 2007-2011 by Jim Hale and Data 1 Systems. Page design copyright © 2008-2013 Martin Wynne. Photo gallery copyright © 2009 David Williams. |