Any Electricians out there.

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121217 (In Topic #6331)
Full Member

What size wire should be used for bus wires ?

Hi Guys,

I am getting back to Y.M.R. and the time has come to put in the bus wires and droppers.

What size wire should I use for the bus wires and droppers.

I have some single core 3 m.m. and 6 m.m. and am not sure which to use where.

John.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121218
Sol
Guest user
John, single core 6mm in diameter is HUGE - carrys the house curent easily. #mm would be OK bur single core ..mmm, not that keen but as long as there are no sharp kinks to fracture it, it will do. Multistrand is better.
Perhaps haveing a read of this may help
DCC Layout Wire & Wiring Accessories
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121219
Avatar
Inactive Member
John, I use 2.5mm twin and earth 240 Volt standard wiring cable for buses and 13 x 1.2 mm flexible multi-strand cable for the droppers.  It comes in red and black on a 25 metre roll from Jaycar.

Strip out the black, red and green from the white covering on the 2.5 service cable.  The red bus is the outside rail and the black is the inside rail.  The droppers should be the same and when you're underneath you can't make a mistake.

Speaking of that, connect a buzzer across the rails after disconnecting your DCC system.  If the buzzer goes off while you are connecting up your droppers, you've made a mistake.  You will never have to look for shorts in the future.

The green will come in handy for a sub-bus when you start to put in block detectors.

I don't know how good your soldering is, but I have done a thread on soldering in the droppers underneath using half of the covering on the bus wire.  It's a piece of cake.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121220
Full Member
Thanks Sol and Max.

I will have to go and get some more cable.

Will keep you posted on results over the next few weeks.

Cheers.

John.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121223
Avatar
Full Member
2.5 or 6, bigger the better, low Voltage = higher current and that will equal more volt drop. But if your doing it as a ring circuit and your layout isn't that big then 2.5 bus should be plenty, as put above, then use a smaller flex to connect to the track.

The real I Like trains kid !

Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121228
Avatar
Inactive Member
Johnno, I'm sure you know this, but just in case . . .

Under no circumstances make your bus into a circle.  A straight line, a TEE, a Wyee; but NEVER a circle.  Putting snubbers on the end is a good idea, as well.

Like I said, you probably already knew that, but I just thought I'd mention it.  :pedal
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121256
Legacy Member
Crickey Max i wired my bus as a ring main , assuming the juice would take the easiest path.  With 2.5  Whats wrong with it Max ?  I must have missed something somewhere. :thud It sems to work ok .

reg
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121259
Avatar
Inactive Member
Hi Reg.  There are several reasons.  Some people propose that a circle of current carrying cable can create an inducted field (like an electro-magnet), which can cause interference.  A more common idea is that where a loco is located close to the feed, signals can travel around the loop and arrive milliseconds later, as a sort of digital echo.

A similar rule seems to apply to the express net bus - in addition, manufacturers recommend twisting the wires in the net bus, as well as not connecting them into a loop.  I've never heard of using snubbers on the express net bus.

Whatever the reason, loops have been found to be the offenders where locos have been behaving erratically, but not always on the same spot on the layout.  It makes sense that it seems to be on the bigger layouts that it's more noticable.  I hope that makes sense in a not too technical way.  I'm sure Geoff will explain it better when he reads this.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121260
Full Member
Good job you mentioned it Max, I was going to make it a circle as I have the one long continuous run.

It,s basically a dog bone with the straigt sections close together to look like dual track so I can run the bus down the middle and just have longer droppers from the two ends.

Hope that makes sense.

Will now redesign it.

Cheers.

Last edit: by AUSSIETRAINS


John.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121266
Full Member
Here,s a quick plan, curtesy of Anyrail.



Hope you can make it out Max.

Edit.

As picture seems a bit small.

All droppers from the outside rail connect to the RED BUS.

All droppers from the inside rail connect to the BLACK BUS.


Last edit: by AUSSIETRAINS


John.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121267
Sol
Guest user
You have got it in one John.

The loop/circle of power works, just that the larger layouts are prone to problems at times as Max mentioned.
Snubbers/terminators are only used on power bus, not control/express net bus.

Can I suggest you read this site?
http://www.wiringfordcc.com/track_2.htm#a52
starting a third of the way down titled
Considerations for Layouts with Long Bus Wires
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121268
Avatar
Inactive Member
Hi John.

You might find that the picture can be improved by right clicking on it then, Edit > Brightness/Contrast > Crop.

From what I can see It looks OK.  As a rule of thumb, take the two bus wires around the layout under the main track, so long as you don't close the loops.  It will help later if you want to put in block detectors for signalling and the like.  Keep the droppers as short as practicable.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121270
Legacy Member
Thanks for that Max. Everything has run ok up to now .  Well i say that, i have had the odd rogue loco ,i have always put it down to  spurious radiation (dont know what that means but i heard of it somewhere.)   At worst i will have to put the sidecutters on the ring about half way round. :thumbs.  Thanks for the info .

reg
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121271
Avatar
Inactive Member
No wurries, Cobber.  :thumbs
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121272
Sol
Guest user
[user=31]sparky[/user] wrote:
Thanks for that Max. Everything has run ok up to now .  Well i say that, i have had the odd rogue loco ,i have always put it down to  spurious radiation (dont know what that means but i heard of it somewhere.)   At worst i will have to put the sidecutters on the ring about half way round. :thumbs.  Thanks for the info .
Reg, don't forget that your rails may also make a ring so be prepared to cut them & put isolators in as well.
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121273
Legacy Member
 Thanks Ron . I have a few natural breaks (unintended) at board joints ,so i should be alright on that side.

reg
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121279
Full Member
My rails make a ring Ron so that means I have to put gaps in too.

John.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121280
Sol
Guest user
Better to do it now John before all is sceniced, etc.
There are so many variables with DCC, that one answer may not be suitable for another layout but in general, if breaks can be included  early, it may save problems later on.
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121293
Ken
Avatar
Inactive Member
Would all this apply to DC wiring too?  

Ken

'It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that Swing'
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#121298
Avatar
Legacy Member
Ken I dont think you would have any problems with D.C. ,well I don't anyway:thumbs 

Bozzy(never known to pass a pub)
Online now: No Back to the top
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.