Ply girder frame baseboards

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141021
Guest user
The South Australian P4 club has used cross braced 7mm ply for 2.3m x 0.7m x 0.15m modules and using both the "Barry Norman" method and just a single skin. There is no sign of warping after 6 years mostly in storage only termite damage to some. Modules are light weight enough to be carried by one person.
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141026
Avatar
Full Member
Is there any difference between the "Barry Norman" box girder structure and the single panel ply frames Sam ?

If not, then the single skin might be an option.  Those Barry Norman "box girders" are very time consuming to make ……..:hmm

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141030
Avatar
Full Member
[user=6]Petermac[/user] wrote:
Is there any difference between the "Barry Norman" box girder structure and the single panel ply frames Sam ?

If not, then the single skin might be an option.  Those Barry Norman "box girders" are very time consuming to make ……..:hmm

Yes, Peter, with the Barry Norman system, you get a free subscription to the BBc's 'Film' programme……..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4lRmG_UXy8   Remember?

[If it strikes a chord with you, hear the 'chords' here, by a ex-Juliard, classicly trained pianist who could not appear at major U.S. concert venues at the time of her pre-eminence because they did not have dressing rooms for black performers…..shame on all of us for not knowing and speaking out sooner.]

Sorry if this is a bit deep, not a 'trolling' or a wind-up, I promise…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TarrSrx4v0

Doug

[A long-time Nina Simone fan]

Last edit: by Chubber


'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil…'  Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin


In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141040
Avatar
Full Member
Lovely song - and theme tune doug but it's not that "Barry Norman" …………….:lol::lol::lol:

Without getting political, I'd agree with everything you say. :cheers

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141072
Guest user
Only that they are quicker to assemble and need less plywood to make, we mostly used the single skin method. I'll try and get a photo next time I'm at the club in about two weeks time. If I see him I'll ask Sol, he may be able to get a photo sooner.
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141089
Avatar
Full Member
I found the it was quite quick to make the frames.
I use a Black & Decker workmate, which enables me to clamp both side pieces and at least two of the spaces all at the same time. The spacers are pre-glued, then slotted between the sides and the workmate tightened.
As the top half of the frame is exposed, I can drill & screw each side of the frame, the move the whole frame along and do the next couple of blocks. Once the upper half is done, the frame is inverted and the lower screws put in.
Keeping the frame in the workmate also helps to keep the whole lot square, too.

Stubby47's Bespoke Model Buildings All photos I post are ©Stu Hilton, but are free for use by anyone.
 
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141091
Avatar
Full Member
Once the "girders" have been made Stu, I agree, it's not too difficult to assemble them into a frame. 

What, to me, takes the time, is actually making the girders.  Everything  is "doubled" - the cutting, the gluing, the stapling into the spacer  blocks (in my case) and, it's amazing how much wood I used up just for  the spacers……..:shock:

Whilst I'd still have the blocks for the corners and cross member  positions to cut out, if I could then just use single strips of ply for  the frames, I wouldn't have to cut the spacers for the "box" beams and  only half the ply.  I would however, have to use diagonal stretchers to  hold the whole thing square.  I don't use those with the "box"  beams………..:roll:

It might be a close run thing but I suspect it would be quicker and  probably cheaper although the ply would have to be thicker.  For the  boxed beams, I only use 4mm ply but would probably have to use 10mm if  it wasn't "boxed".

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141095
Avatar
Full Member
Sorry Peter, for 'frames 'read 'girders' in my previous post.
I too only use thin ply (4.5mm) with 1" x 4" x 4" spacers with 8" to 11" gaps between them.

Stubby47's Bespoke Model Buildings All photos I post are ©Stu Hilton, but are free for use by anyone.
 
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141097
Guest user
Hi Guys,

My layout baseboards are 12mm ply built in box form but only single thickness. They have been made for over 5 years now and show no sign of twisting. The box construction is 300mm squares by 100mm deep. This egg box structure is then covered by 12mm thick ply. 50mm x 50mm legs are just bolted to this frame in appropriate places for legs with screw adjustable feet. Each vertical piece has a slot cut into it for the wiring. I have an L shaped layout 2.5Mtrs x 900mm deep and the other leg is 1.6Mtrs long by 700mm deep. They are attached by 12mm bolts and wingnuts together with cabinet makers biscuits for alignment.

Hope this is helpful

Puffer
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141098
Avatar
Inactive Member
I think we'd better have some photos, John.   :twisted:
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141102
Avatar
Full Member
Yes Max, I feel there might be some confusion over terminology creeping in here.

This is what I call a "box girder" or "box beam":




I'm suggesting that I might be able to use just a single piece of ply (albeit thicker) and do away with the duplicate cutting of ply "cheeks".  What are currently the spacers, would become blocks into which the "rungs" are screwed in a conventional "ladder" type of frame construction.


'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141125
Avatar
Full Member
 

..there is a lighter, more rigid alternative, if you have a saw blade that will cut a kerf of the correct width to allow the direct insertion of thin ply [as thin as 2mm will still work] then girders made of 1" square softwood either side of a 3 1/2" play strip, end-glued into 4" boards as shown below. The 'I' beam is amazingly rigid, this proportion and construction was used in early home-build aeroplanes!





 



 

'Evostick Resin W' white glue is quite good enough, no need for Aerolite or P.V.U. types.

 

Doug



'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil…'  Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin


In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141174
Guest user
[user=6]Petermac[/user] wrote
It might be a close run thing but I suspect it would be quicker and  probably cheaper although the ply would have to be thicker.  For the  boxed beams, I only use 4mm ply but would probably have to use 10mm if  it wasn't "boxed".
I was reminded today that some of our modules are closer to 20 years old with no problems encountered. We used 6/7mm exterior grade 5 ply. I also have some even older single skin modules 915 x 305 x 100 made from 4mm ply that are still quite sound. I have recently assembled these into a 1830 x 610 x 100 module for a possible P87 (HO) shunting layout.
Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141176
Avatar
Full Member
Thanks Sam - I think you've sold it to me …………………….:hmm:cheers

Doug - thanks for your input too.  As ever, an excellent high quality unit. :thumbs  Studying it, I could quite easily rout a groove for the corner braces on my router table but I'm not altogether sure the structure would end up saving me much time over my box girder……………:roll::roll:  It would certainly save some expensive ply but, and it's maybe the same with you, here, buying PSE timber is a bit like buying bananas - EU regulations say they ought to be straight but they're usually not !!! 

I'm told they air dry the timber here rather than kiln drying - but only down to around 15 or 20% then rip it into the required sections.  The stresses (and remaining moisture) come out by the time it reaches the woodyard and, by then, it's pretty useless.  The lack of "true" timbers was the main reason I went for the box girder in the first place.

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141183
Avatar
Full Member
[user=6]Petermac[/user] wrote:
  The stresses (and remaining moisture) come out by the time it reaches the woodyard and, by then, it's pretty useless.  The lack of "true" timbers was the main reason I went for the box girder in the first place.

Yup, it's hard to find good stuff here, I agree, but I suppose I do have the advantage of being able to rip boards and plane/thickness them by machine. For dimensional stability otherwise, ply is hard to beat.

 

Doug

'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil…'  Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin


In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141186
Avatar
Full Member
[user=583]Puffer[/user] wrote:
Hi Guys,

My layout baseboards are 12mm ply built in box form but only single thickness. They have been made for over 5 years now and show no sign of twisting. The box construction is 300mm squares by 100mm deep. This egg box structure is then covered by 12mm thick ply. 50mm x 50mm legs are just bolted to this frame in appropriate places for legs with screw adjustable feet. Each vertical piece has a slot cut into it for the wiring. I have an L shaped layout 2.5Mtrs x 900mm deep and the other leg is 1.6Mtrs long by 700mm deep. They are attached by 12mm bolts and wingnuts together with cabinet makers biscuits for alignment.

Hope this is helpful

Puffer
I'm with you Puffer. I've used plywood 'egg-crate' construction for the past 30 years and I've never had a baseboard go out of square yet. This gives you the option of having flat-eath areas for stations, MPDs etc but still retains the ability to leave the rest of the layout as 'open plan' with the trackbed raised up on plywood risers screwed to the sides of the egg-crate grid. Forming gadients is a piece of cake by just using gradually increased or decreased riser hights.

Last edit: by Chinahand


Regards,
Trevor
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141375
Sol
Avatar
Site staff
Sol is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
Here is one module on its side in the new club rooms that so far, has no lights




you can see more modules behind this one - they are about 8 ft long by 2' - 2'6" long - light enough to be carried by one person. Everything is glued.

Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141378
Avatar
Full Member
Now that's what I call baseboards :shock::shock::shock:

Obviously built by someone who knows what he's doing Sol.  A lot of angles in there …………not sure I'm up to that standard.:hmm

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141388
Sol
Avatar
Site staff
Sol is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
[user=6]Petermac[/user] wrote:
Obviously built by someone who knows what he's doing Sol.  A lot of angles in there …………not sure I'm up to that standard.:hmm
He, until he retired, was a Prosecutor in our Police Force.

Last edit: by Sol


Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#141397
Avatar
Full Member
So he did know what he was doing Sol  - learnt his trade building gallows …………:cheers

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.