Blossom Hill 2

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289741
Avatar
Full Member

A small 00 Branch Line

Decision Time

Just for fun I raided the toy box to see what a branch line station could look like on an 8 x 4 board in 00 scale.

There is not much room and the whole set up is very crammed, I had to use curved points at one end and the curves are very tight - 2nd radius.  As you can see from the pictures it all looks too compacted:

thumbnail_IMG_1845.jpg thumbnail_IMG_1846.jpg
The track and stock are from my old layout, with some very ancient Hornby buildings.

I have now made up my mind.  I am going to try out TT120 and will be ordering in some bits and pieces to make a start.

Last edit: by Bob K

Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289745
Ed
Avatar
Site staff
Ed is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
Good luck Bob, I'll be following along.  :thumbs3:



Ed


Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#289755
Avatar
Full Member
I was browsing the internet and looking at Eynsham to see if there were anymore pictures of the station.  In particular, I am looking for the colours of the paintwork on the buildings.  During my search I looked at the Eynsham Museum site and, low and behold, there were two pictures of a model of the station.  Pictures posted courtesy of Eynsham Museum:

363362494_265202059584270_6433151481048007879_n.jpg
Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 20.54.01.png
The army logistics base at the bottom of the picture is interesting.

Now, I am not going to model Eynsham, I am using it as inspiration and to provide a prototype template for my track plan, but it is good to see a model of it.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by EdLiked by Bob K)
#289757
Avatar
Full Member
Looks great but even better with a backscene :)

LAYOUT.jpg  

Phil
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289776
Avatar
Full Member
That looks good    :thumbs3:

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289801
Avatar
Breaker of Things
breakage is in the usergroup ‘Administrators’

Phil.c said

Looks great but even better with a backscene :)

LAYOUT.jpg  

Reply test.

Signatures? Where we're going we don't need no stinking signatures!
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289812
Avatar
Full Member

Phil.c said

Looks great but even better with a backscene :)


That is a major improvement.  Apologies for not responding sooner, had access problems.

Bob
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289813
Avatar
Full Member

Petermac said

That looks good    :thumbs3:

What is interesting is the colour scheme on the station building of cream and green.  Not really GWR colours.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289814
Avatar
Full Member
Having experimented with several ideas, I have now settled upon a track plan; a simplified version of Eynsham.  Even in TT:120 there is insufficient space for an exact copy of the prototype. Here is an overview:

thumbnail_IMG_1858.jpg
Detail of the station area.  I had to kink the long siding to make space for the goods shed and I have removed one of the goods loops.:

thumbnail_IMG_1857.jpg
Looking in the other direction.  The signals are N gauge from my spares box:

thumbnail_IMG_1859.jpg
I think by using TT:120 track I have created a much better layout that was possible in 00 gauge.

Bob
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289815
Ed
Avatar
Site staff
Ed is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
Think it's better without the extra goods loop, just wondering how accurate the original drawings were.

Can't see how many goods loops there are, in the museum layout.



Ed
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289816
Avatar
Full Member

Ed said

Think it's better without the extra goods loop, just wondering how accurate the original drawings were.

Can't see how many goods loops there are, in the museum layout.



Ed

There were definitely two loops as can be seen from these two pictures:

Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 15.58.18.png 7412_3653_Eynsham_1962.jpg
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289817
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289819
Avatar
Full Member
I can't really see the point of that middle loop Bob - it's short and boxed in by the main lines and inner siding so, other than for storage it doesn't seem to serve much purpose.  It wouldn't be accessible by vehicles if the two outer sidings were in use.  It might offer some shunting oportunities but I'd be inclined to do away with it and lengthen the platform so you'd have a similar length on both up and down platforms - or, as it's single line traffic, the north and south platforms ………….  You could add a headshunt coming off the siding with the buffer stop.   Not sure what traffic you plan but the platform only looks long enough for a loco and a couple of carriages - maybe that's enough for a branch line.   :07rolleyes_2:

Is it all set track or do they make flexi in TT120 ?

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289882
Avatar
Full Member

Petermac said

I can't really see the point of that middle loop Bob - it's short and boxed in by the main lines and inner siding so, other than for storage it doesn't seem to serve much purpose.  It wouldn't be accessible by vehicles if the two outer sidings were in use.  It might offer some shunting oportunities but I'd be inclined to do away with it and lengthen the platform so you'd have a similar length on both up and down platforms - or, as it's single line traffic, the north and south platforms ………….  You could add a headshunt coming off the siding with the buffer stop.   Not sure what traffic you plan but the platform only looks long enough for a loco and a couple of carriages - maybe that's enough for a branch line.   :07rolleyes_2:

Is it all set track or do they make flexi in TT120 ?

Sorry, missed this one Peter. At the moment TT:120 is limited to set track, as far as I know. If I go ahead with this plan, it will not be a copy of Eynsham, I am just using it to get some ideas from the prototype.
Bob
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289885
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#289886
Avatar
Full Member

Ed said

Peco make code 55 flexitrack  and unifrog points Bob.


PECO - Tagged "narrow-gauge, tt-120, 55, track"



Ed

Thanks Ed, that's useful to know.  

Seemingly Hornby are planning a big announcement about TT:120 on the 2nd of April.  I am holding fire until I see what they have to say. I am currently rather disappointed over the lack of locos and rolling stock and remain sitting on the fence as to whether I should fully commit to this scale.

Bob
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290004
Ed
Avatar
Site staff
Ed is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
I'm getting email alerts from various model shops about Hornby TT:120 new announcements, one of which is an LNER J50 expected November 2024.

Doesn't help if you want to model the Green, Wet and Rusty though  :mutley
Locomotives (themodelcentre.com)

Ed
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290007
Avatar
Full Member

Ed said

I'm getting email alerts from various model shops about Hornby TT:120 new announcements, one of which is an LNER J50 expected November 2024.

Doesn't help if you want to model the Green, Wet and Rusty though
Locomotives (themodelcentre.com)

Ed
Yes Ed, not very promising.  It seems odd that Hornby are ignoring the GWR in TT:120.  Even the planned signals move the wrong way!

I have just about made up my mind, despite the limitations, I am thinking of building a compact 00 layout.

Bob
 

Last edit: by Bob K

Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290008
Avatar
Full Member
Please explain Bob……………………….

I thought you'd had a good look at TT120 and decided to give it a go - why the change of heart now ?  Surely not driven away by the prospect of an LNER loco arriving ………..

'Petermac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290009
Avatar
Full Member

Petermac said

Please explain Bob……………………….

I thought you'd had a good look at TT120 and decided to give it a go - why the change of heart now ?  Surely not driven away by the prospect of an LNER loco arriving ………..

Hi Peter,
I really am having difficulty deciding where to go.  I have enough TT:120 stuff to build a layout, but nothing to run on it.  I really want to model a GWR branch line and have been waiting nearly 2 years for some appropriate stuff from Hornby.  This latest release does not help. On the other hand, I do have a couple of 00 gauge GWR tank engines, track and buildings as well as rolling stock from the left overs of my previous efforts.  I am thinking of building an 00 gauge layout and maybe try TT:120 in a few years when things improve.

Alternatively, I could just sit on my hands and wait for the locos to be released. I might just set something up so that I can run some trains!  I do like TT:120 though.

Bob
Online now: No Back to the top
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.