Bachmann Crocodile advice needed...make it snappy!

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244702 (In Topic #13514)
Avatar
Full Member
 Having lashed out a whole £5 at Chris's Crafts [Plymouth PL4 0NH  T: 01752 665 007 ] I am now a Crocodile keeper. Made by Bachmann, it  looks OK but the wheel sets and bearings are pretty antediluvian. Any  suggestions as to the easiest/least expensive way of replacing  wheels/coupling etc? I should prefer to keep it 'tension lock'.
   
  I have bought it to carry my 'Tugwell-Pushleys', the manufactory for  such will be my 'industry' on my nascent trainset. It will gve an  opportunity for a OO9/OO interchange.












Douglas

'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil…'  Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin


In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244714
Avatar
Full Member
Old Mainline design. Bogies are questionable (those holes and bearing covers), wheels are simply pull out, push in.

Search GWR Crocodile H to see what the prototype plate-frame looked like.

Tension locks. Cut off old ones from bogie, replace with narrow long ones (Bachmann Accessories #36-026).

Nigel

©Nigel C. Phillips
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244717
Avatar
Full Member
Thanks for your input, Nigel. Yup, my GWR wagons appendix doesn't show 'holes' in what should be solid plate frame bogies although the spoked wheels are right for this 45 ton wagon. Sadly Cambrian models no longer do a suitable replacement, and Bachmann can't help. It would have the B.R. oil boxes for the post-war period I'm looking to modelling, although I can't imagine the railway busting a gut to get a [by then] rarely used 1920s wagon up to the latest spec. and livery by, say, 1955…

I just couldn't resist it for a fiver, a BR grey spray won't take 5 minutes and it can sit at the projected Tugwell/mainline transfer point if it all comes to nought.

Best wishes,

Douglas

P.s., I do appreciate that the load would not be resting on the middle of the 'floor', but more realistically on beams running the full length of the well on the cross members [there is a perfectly legible notice to this effect on the inside of each end deck, not bad work for such an old model] or on cross girders supporting each buffer beam. D


Last edit: by Chubber


'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil…'  Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin


In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244720
Avatar
Full Member
The bogies on the Crocodile G (1888 rebuilt1909) had the holes. Load capacity 35 tons. Still around in the 1990's in places such as BSC for internal use. Also found on the Fs. And Macaws.

BR would be Weltrol WG I think. 

Nigel

Edit: File off the leaf spring on the bottom of each bogie to make it a G.

©Nigel C. Phillips
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244785
Avatar
Full Member
Hi Douglas

The Bachmann Weltrol might be a possible donor for bogies perhaps????  That would give you a NEM pocket and small couplings.  Just a thought but appreciate that there might be differences that are not acceptable

Barry

Shed dweller, Softie Southerner and Meglomaniac
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#244787
Avatar
Inactive Member
Hi Chubber. I replaced the wheels with Hornby or Bachmann 12mm spoked wheels. They clip fitted in with no problem and did improved the running.


I'm old, that's why I'm allowed to change my mind, when I can find it.

My Website: index
Online now: No Back to the top
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.