Somewhat frustrating .......
Posted
#291953
(In Topic #22007)
Full Member
Fitting loco crews.
I've just spent half my life carefully painting some 4mm scale Model U loco crews - whilst not up to professional standards, I'm not too disappointed with the results, particularly for an old codger with failing eyesight and less than steady hands.My frustration is that I've found it almost impossible to get them into several tank engines - it seems I may have to remove the loco body to access the footplate.
Additionally, once in place, unless I want to do close-up photography, one can hardly see them !! At over £5 per figure, before any shipping costs, I'm not at all sure I'll be buying too many more. I could settle for the considerably less detailed but much cheaper offerings on the market…………..
Am I missing something - how do you guys get them into your locos ?
'Petermac
Posted
Full Member
Phil
Posted
Full Member
Also, given your erstwhile job, you no doubt found it relatively simple to squeeze them into a tank engine footplate - you're the type who could de-coke an engine through the exhaust pipe !! I, on the other hand, need lots of room to manoeuvre………………..
'Petermac
Posted
Full Member
Phil
Posted
Full Member
Cheers Pete.
Posted
Full Member
Most need inserting with tweezers and holding in place while the glue goes off. Superglue is ok but I find UHU often works better bonding plastic to metal. If it’s plastic to plastic then Contacta Pro is the preferred adhesive.
Some locos and some crew play nice. Some require patience beyond that of a saint and multiple attempts to get stuck into position. One or two locos kindly allowed me to remove the cab roof which made fitting easier. And some have required “life-changing surgery” to fit of which the Beattie well-tank crews had to be cut at the waist and on a curve (ground out with a round needle-file) to be stuck onto the curved splashers where they intrude into the cab.
Posted
Full Member
I remember fitting some crew into a Bachmann 57xx and a Hornby 14xx, Not having the lower half of the body made it a bit easier, and hid the motor. Easier if the body is removed. My notes say I removed the doors of the 57xx using a fine scalpel blade and then added the dismembered crew. They also say NEVER DO THIS AGAIN! After that my tanks were crew-less. The exception is the GWR 0-6-2 (56xx) I'm slowly working on - scratch-built brass body and a of space inside the cab, A detachable roof (to be held in place with small magnets) will help. Several years ago I spent an hour in the cab of a 56xx - it's quite cramped.
N scale is not worth bothering with, except for steam locomotives when they go on the footplate.
Nigel
©Nigel C. Phillips
Posted
Site staff

Must have much better eyesight then me
Posted
Full Member
How I wish I'd done it when fitting decoders etc. when the body and chassis were separated. However, spilt milk etc. so I may persevere with the odd one but most will remain crew-less until such time as I have loads of patience and steady hands or I need to take the bodies off again …………….
'Petermac
Posted
Full Member
Phil
Posted
Full Member
You could always put crew in when you do the 6 month service.
I remember buying an OO Mainline Warship that had a driver at one end. That seemed a bit silly for a locomotive with a cab at either end. So I put a driver in the other end. Even sillier. So I binned both. The same issues with the LIMA GWR railcar.
HO scale US diesels I don't have to worry about. Except for a cab in the middle, where the driver is looking through the back of his/her head when going backwards. That said, long and short hood diesels can have drivers and engineers facing in different directions depending on the railroad. Long hood for the Great Northern and Southern, everybody else short hood. My HO Proto 2000 SD9 had seats and crew, it took 2 hours to move them 180° so the long hood was forward. Wonder what they do in reverse? And what about the direction the crew face with a steam locomotive going backwards?
I was taking that Great Northern E7A apart this afternoon. BLI/Precision provide a detailed cab with seats. I just might put some crew in sans legs. Taking the body shell off takes 2 fingernails and 5 seconds. I've yet to receive one comment at a show about the lack of crew. Never mind the quality, feel the width!
Nigel
©Nigel C. Phillips
Posted
Full Member
'Petermac
Posted
Full Member
I'm curious too as I have one set up for eight yearsPetermac said
It's the 6 month service that made me smile Nigel ………………………………………….what's one of those please ?
From “Post #292,027”, 12th April 2025, 1:12 pm
Phil
Posted
Full Member
As an aficionado of secondhand locomotives I think I've seen it all - seized motor bearings, seized worms, broken drive shafts (from seized worms), burnt-out motors (from seized worms), seized gears, split axles….. oils and grease oxidize and turn waxy. It's Probably worthwhile servicing before installing a stay-alive. Or converting to DCC. Just saying.
That $100/£140 locomotive is relatively much more valuable than the car you use. By at least a factor of 100.
Nigel
©Nigel C. Phillips
Posted
Site staff

Petermac said
It's the 6 month service that made me smile Nigel ………………………………………….what's one of those please ?
From “Post #292,027”, 12th April 2025, 1:12 pm
Peter ! I know this one !! You service ONE loco, every six months
Wasnie me, a big boy did it and ran away
"Why did you volunteer ? I didn't Sir, the other three stepped backwards"
"Why did you volunteer ? I didn't Sir, the other three stepped backwards"
Posted
Site staff

Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Posted
Full Member
Set up a schedule.
Sol: We're all running driver-less engines run by computers. Luckily ours do not weigh 200 tons and are pulling 10,000 tons behind them.
Nigel
©Nigel C. Phillips
Posted
Full Member
The underlying reason was that the second-man was required to operate the train-heating boiler and, on the WR, to assist in sighting signals some of which were on the right as a relic of steam days.
The reality was also that the union really ran the job and would not have suffered mass redundancies when steam firemen were no longer required. So they made sure there were “jobs for the boys” insisting on a crew of two with diesels.
Two crew were also required in the earlier days of high-speed operation. The then Department of Transport was wary of a solo driver being in charge of a very fast train despite the presence of safety devices. So all trains scheduled to run at a faster speed than 100mph required two drivers until vigilance devices were introduced.
That had an effect upon timetabling because the cost of double-manning at weekend rates was considered prohibitive. So the WR, initially the only user of HSTs, was a 125mph railway through the week but limited to 100mph on Sundays when single-manning was the norm and getting people somewhere faster was not so important.
How many crew are in your cabs? My hydraulics all have two - the rest all have one except for those I can’t break into.
Posted
Full Member
Cheers Pete.
Posted
Full Member
'Petermac
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.
