Boghouses / Tŷ Bach

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290675
Avatar
Full Member

N / OO9 Two scales one gauge

For those following the electrical issues I connected the two points which will feed the upper fiddle yard today. These are electrofrogs and will lead to dead-end sidings. They behave exactly as I expect: continuous power to the route set and no potential to the other (as opposed to no power because the non-set route will be ++ or - - not isolated) 
 
I haven’t figured out why the electrofrog 3-way point does not behave the same way but it does have frog wires which those mentioned above do not. 
 
The points on the main running area which cause stalling do appear to be Unifrog which may be a problem. I have yet to find a means of routing power through the frog when operating the points manually. 

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290677
Ed
Avatar
Site staff
Ed is in the usergroup ‘Super-moderators’
Probably the picture Rick, but the gradient looks a bit steep.

Regarding the frog switching, surely the point blades switch the frog when being operated manually.

I though Peco always stated their points should work straight out of the box and you don't
have to add any additional frog switching.



Ed
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290679
Avatar
Full Member
Thanks Ed

Yes the gradient is steep at 30% but some Welsh narrow-gauge mountain lines have or have had some very steep sections. The Ffestiniog has 1:68 which taxes even a Double-Fairlie with an average train. 

In modelling we always have to make compromises. Gradient is one of those. Many models include utterly unfeasible gradients were they to be applied to the main line. 

I can only just (by 1.5mm) obtain the clearance required above the N-gauge yard in the distance available. If the gradient were eased I would have to reconfigure the entire fiddle-yard arrangements. 

Peco points should “work out of the box” but it seems that over the years that has been sacrificed. Electrofrog points used in pairs always need insulated joiners for example but insulfrogs can cause stalling and have that visibly-plastic brown frog. 

Peco’s own “Wiring the Layout” publication is clear on some matters but not on others. It has not yet been updated to include the unifrog range. 

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290682
Avatar
Full Member
Slight change of plan. 
 
The intended double-deck fiddle-yard will be a single-deck but split-level affair. 
 
Combining thoughts and problems has led to a modest re-design of the off-scene end. 
 
I am dispensing with the three-way point and replacing it with two simple turnouts. That allows use of “normal” electrofrog points which create isolated dead-ends for the roads not set without need of frog juicers. They take up more space so only one and not three sidings will be long enough to hold the loco-plus-four-wagons freight and then only with millimetres clearance. 
 
The mountain branch gradient, despite being within the capability of all locos on any train, looks too steep. Therefore it will be eased and with no need to now clear the lower level it will feed sidings beside rather than directly above it. Though at a slightly higher level to avoid the need to go up then down. 
 
I may or may not replace the unifrog points on the layout with electrofrogs again to avoid a need for motors and juicers. 
 
That leaves the crossover to wire up. I have the required switch. It does appear to rely on motor operation but Peco’s own wiring booklet is not clear on the subject. 
 
More thinking required. 

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290683
Avatar
Full Member
With the “lower” fiddle yard finally relaid to my satisfaction I can turn my attention once more to the branch and “upper” yard. 

Despite having shortened two of the three sidings all which needs to fit will fit. 

There will only be two N-gauge trains - one freight and one passenger - which leaves the third siding available to store stock of either scale on. The wider 009 stock will fit into any siding with an N-gauge train adjacent to it. Just!!!
IMG_7905.jpeg IMG_7906.jpeg

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290690
Avatar
Full Member
Mode = twiddling thumbs.

Waiting for parts.

The unifrog point issue will be resolved by replacing them with electrofrog points.  That will mean slight re-location of the track ends since medium-radius electrofrogs are no longer available.  I have had to opt for large-radius.  The non-set routes will be dead-ends so will remain at no-potential.  ++ or –  Some modellers suggest it is not good practice to leave stock on a no-potential but "live" line.  I can't see the problem but I could be missing something.  

The mountain branch also awaits the arrival of a curved point.  In order to fit the reconfigured yard space this branch will bifurcate halfway up the gradient and just off-scene.  One track will be a short siding, adequate for the passenger train, and the other will be a longer siding suitable for freights / slates and the skip rakes.  I may even be able to get a third, very short, siding in right at the top; there is the width but maybe not the length of board.  

So I am awaiting parts before much more progress can be made.  And the mail is now held to ransom by Storm Darragh so nothing is expected until at least Tuesday.  Being where we are we seldom get mail delivered on Monday as the RM waits for a full van-load before coming out here.  

Wiring up the crossover switch will probably have to wait until the New Year.  I need to move the computer off the desk for its own safety during soldering.  The only place it might go is into the spare room which is Sharon's office when she works from home.  In between storms and holidays she is likely to be in there most days until early January.  

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290693
Avatar
Full Member
The upper level is now in place with track loosely positioned. This shows the intent. One long line, one short line and (to the left) the passenger siding at the top of the gradient. It’s level there so nothing will roll away!  


Construction is Woodland Scenics 3% gradient poly-blocks cut as required and topped with card to allow a solid surface. The upper level platform is foam-board mounted on timber off-cuts. 


I shall face the poly-blocks with card when the track laying is done. Just to make it look tidy.

    IMG_7923.jpeg

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290706
Avatar
Full Member
The awaited points arrived today. Things finally work as I wanted them to. 

The upper (00-9) yard tracks are in. 

A Bagueley-Drewry arrives uphill with a train of slate and ballast empties. And with a deft change of one point the main-line Hunslet leads the bug-boxes down the mountain 

The N-gauge stock awaits its turn in the lower yard. Maybe impatiently as the N-gauge backscene is set! 


Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290708
Avatar
Full Member
The revised track layout is in. The slightly longer large radius points have given rise to a slight relocation of tracks in the station area and a quite sharp (but credibly narrow-gauge) curve at the entry to the mountain branch. 
 
It all runs as I want it to.  
 
The N-gauge  class 158 passenger train at Boghouses. 

IMG_7946.jpeg
And the OO-9 Baldwin leading a freight up the mountain away from Tŷ Bach with the passenger stock resting on the shed road. The gradient has been slightly eased. 

IMG_7947.jpeg

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290714
Avatar
Full Member
A short story 

I bought the first 009 loco, a Baldwin, for use on Porthgarrow. I then saw a very good price advertised on a second similar loco. As Porthgarrow is a show layout I bought the second one as a reserve. If one loco fails on show and you haven’t a spare you have no moving train. 

The second loco was weathered more heavily than the first and normally sat “on shed” as a dumped rusty hulk. 

At one show the first loco had been running non-stop for two hours so I decided to swap them and rest the warm one. The rusty one at first refused to move. Thinking I had maybe bought a dud and that was why it was cheap I resigned myself to having a static display while the “A” loco rested. 

One of “those things” then happened. I accidentally turned the power control towards full instead of towards off. 

Lo and behold! The rusty hulk not only started to move but it was hissing, wheezing, slipping and then chuffing!!!  I had a sound-fitted loco bought as a standard (non-sound) item making sound on a DC layout. I then learned that this is both normal and that extra power is required but I had discovered both by happy accident!!  

Today I called in at the club room and collected the stock off Porthgarrow, which lives there, for use on Tŷ Bach. The laden skips and the sound-fitted Baldwin have joined the rest of the 009 fleet in the cottage. Porthgarrow is not due on show until July 2025 so leaving the stock there served no purpose. 

A slightly brisk start - as the controller needs careful handling to start the sound-fitted loco smoothly - and a climb up the mountain was caught on camera. 


Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Barchester)
#290715
Avatar
Full Member
Hi Rick,

What a good find and happy incident! The loco sounds marveleous :choochoo:

Cheers,
Claus
www.flickr.com/photos/ellef/
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290717
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290718
Full Member
Go on, Rick. Let the sound bug bite you.

Cheers Pete.
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290721
Avatar
Full Member

peterm said

Go on, Rick. Let the sound bug bite you.


I don’t object to sound at that level. On DC I have no control over it and for reasons already mentioned I am not getting into DCC. 

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290722
Avatar
Full Member
Another milestone was reached today with the fitting of all the platform edging. 


The faces are Scalescenes TX24 Dark Brown Brick. The coping stones are from Metcalfe pack P0210 “Stone Paving Slabs”. 


With the use of two gauges some ingenuity has been applied to get a realistic appearance at both scales. The download was printed at 63% which is TT120-size. Approximately midway between 1:76 and 1:148. The coping stones are a size which scales up for 1:76 to around 18” x 12” and down for 1:148 to around 36” x 24”. Not utterly unrealistic either way. 


 The 009 platform, which doubles as the N-gauge loco siding and which will have some redundant wagons on it, has brick edging rather than pavers. This is because the clearance to some carriage doors is minimal and the height of a card paver was too much compared with just printed paper.

In due course the platform surfaces will be infilled with a mix of materials. And then the ballast can go down.

We see the main-line Hunslet in the platform with a bug-box illustrating the minimal clearance. Slate wagons sit in the other active platform and skips are parked on the siding. The island platform nearest the camera is disused with track lifted
 
  IMG_7971.jpeg IMG_7972.jpeg And we see the N-gauge class 158 at its platform with a “gronk” class 08 awaiting its next duty and a “megabox” wagon on the siding IMG_7973.jpeg IMG_7974.jpeg

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
Item has a rating of 5 (Liked by Ed)
#290729
Avatar
Full Member
With the layout sufficiently advanced that I can run trains the Seasonal Shopper’s Special is seen returning to Tŷ Bach from its trip down the valley.  

Pausing in the station after running  

 And off up the mountain to return the hill folk home.    IMG_7978.jpeg


IMG_7981.jpeg


IMG_7980.jpeg


IMG_7979.jpeg

Last edit: by Gwiwer


Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290736
Avatar
Full Member
More progress. 

The ballasting has been started. As has the representation of now-lifted tracks. The platform surfaces are almost complete. Printed card has been used for asphalt areas and a mix of fine materials for the “gravel”. 


 
IMG_7982.jpeg IMG_7983.jpeg IMG_7984.jpeg IMG_7986.jpeg IMG_7987.jpeg

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290737
Avatar
Full Member

Gwiwer said

More progress.

The ballasting has been started. As has the representation of now-lifted tracks. The platform surfaces are almost complete. Printed card has been used for asphalt areas and a mix of fine materials for the “gravel”.



Hi Rick, I like the photos. How did you make the 'now-lifted tracks'?

Cheers,
Claus
www.flickr.com/photos/ellef/
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290738
Avatar
Full Member

Claus Ellef said

Gwiwer said

More progress.

The ballasting has been started. As has the representation of now-lifted tracks. The platform surfaces are almost complete. Printed card has been used for asphalt areas and a mix of fine materials for the “gravel”.



Hi Rick, I like the photos. How did you make the 'now-lifted tracks'?



The “lifted” trackbed is done using a length of track settled into dry ballast but not pinned. The ballast is then sprayed with the usual PVA adhesive. After an hour or two - when the PVA has worked through the ballast but has not dried - carefully lift the track panel. I used tweezers as it’s N-gauge track and hard to grip with fingers. 

Rick
Layouts here and here
Online now: No Back to the top

Post

Posted
Rating:
#290739
Avatar
Full Member

Gwiwer said

Claus Ellef said

Gwiwer said

More progress.

The ballasting has been started. As has the representation of now-lifted tracks. The platform surfaces are almost complete. Printed card has been used for asphalt areas and a mix of fine materials for the “gravel”.



Hi Rick, I like the photos. How did you make the 'now-lifted tracks'?



The “lifted” trackbed is done using a length of track settled into dry ballast but not pinned. The ballast is then sprayed with the usual PVA adhesive. After an hour or two - when the PVA has worked through the ballast but has not dried - carefully lift the track panel. I used tweezers as it’s N-gauge track and hard to grip with fingers. 

Thank you. The narrow railway at Wombat Creek may have a lifted track, too.

Cheers,
Claus
www.flickr.com/photos/ellef/
Online now: No Back to the top
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.