| You are here: Your Model Railway Club > Getting You Started. > The Lineside. > Is it me? Peco 16.5mm Bullhead track...where's the rest of the kit? | To bottom of page |
| Video Archive | Recent Topics |
|---|
|
|
||||||
| ||||||
| Moderated by: Spurno |
|
|||||||||
| Is it me? Peco 16.5mm Bullhead track...where's the rest of the kit? - The Lineside. - Getting You Started. - Your Model Railway Club | ||||||||||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger 
My photos:
|
I have bought a length of the new, more prototypical Bullhead flexitrack and very nice it is too, notwithstanding its eyewatering £5 a length. My intentions are to have this trackwork 'fronting' the station/yard areas with cheaper stuff out in the sticks and hidden sidings etc., however, there seem only to be a LH and RH large radius points available at £32 each and they are too long for a runrounds, access pointwork for engine sheds etc. Moreover the thought of the price a single slip and long crossing in this range brings me out in a cold sweat!! I wonder if you have any suggestions for a. Alternative manufacturers pointwork to use with the new Peco flexitrack as I do like the sleeper spacing and fine appearance b. Alternative manufacturers pointwork and flexitrack you'd recommend over and above Messrs Peco c. Alternatives to cutting out a proportion of sleepers from Peco track to achieve a better appearance as I did on Bear's End I await the Douglas ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Headmaster Full Member 
My photos:
|
Hi there You ask exactly the same questions I asked myself when beginning Faversham Creek. The Bullhead track was new out, and I really liked the profile, the rail joiners and the sleeper spacing. But there were no "points" available at all. Now there are large ones, but for many of us modellers with limited space, it is not very helpful. It is most unhelpful to introduce a new track option, but not offer all of the components we will need. I am certain I would have invested the extra cost if all necessary items had been available, but instead I went will the traditional, and more complete, trackwork. As a business model it seems daft! So…. A: No idea, I'm afraid. I was advised to make my own..... but I don't have those skills - nor the interest if I'm honest. I envy those who do it, but it's not why I model and I really don't have the skills which means it would be a very expensive process B: I'm not sure there is a ready to run alternative. I explored this quite a bit when I was setting out and the alternatives seemed to be make your own..... Others may be better informed C: Did you do this? I did it on my programming track, just as an experiment, and it was a nightmare trying to keep everything square and even! Hats off to you if you managed it, although it still leaves a problem with points, doesn't it? And I found it very trick on curves. By very tricky I mean next to impossible! I too have found no solution, and I have scoured the internet. Again, wiser people may know. In the end I went with Peco track and accepted the limitations. I have been experimenting with my ballasting. My usual efforts are pretty poor really, but thankfully the only section I have done at Faversham is virtually hidden. However, my recent experiments have been much better when I have used as little ballast as possible and ensured that what I do use, fills all gaps. Much more realistic even with the disappointing track. I am no rivet counter and it really bothers me, so what is doing for my counting cousins I can only imagine! If you, or any members, have a solution, I will be delighted - even if I have to rip up all my track. And If anyone from Peco ever gets to read this, please, please, please release all necessary trackwork when you launch such a great new concept! Regards Michael ____________________ Michael Faversham Creek "There is no harm in repeating a good thing." Plato |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
BCDR Moderator 
My photos:
|
Hi Douglas, A. Turnouts. DIY using C+L or DCC Concepts components, or Markway/SMP (I think you would have to add cosmetic chairs but the turnouts are cheaper than Peco, sleepers are thinner) or regular code 75 flat bottom turnouts. B. C+L Code 75 flex track looks a lot better than Peco. C. Use C+L track or SMP track (Markway). From memory the C+L sleepers are much better spaced and a bit longer. DCC Concepts have flex track as well in code 75, but in stainless steel. I use SMP code 75 bullhead track for EM. It uses a 3 bolt pattern for the chairs. All this looks a lot better than re-spaced Peco track. SMP OO in code 75 B/H is £39.50 for a box of 10 yards. Until Peco decide whether they will or will not expand the range of Bull head turnouts it's DIY or Markway for RTR. The GWR, in the days before track standards were implemented by the government in the 1920's, quite happily used baulk road timbered bridge rail (in standard gauge, recycled from broad gauge), bull head rail with chairs and flat bottomed spiked rail as circumstances and finances dictated. Old 9 foot long sleepers were to be found in rural sidings until the 1960's. Mixing and matching is prototypical. I would use some code 75 turnouts and stop worrying about it. Or get into the wonderful world of DIY turnouts. C+L do point kits, soldered-up frogs (#5 to #9 in B/H), point blades, chairs with various bolt patterns (2, 3 or 4, check the railway company). DCC Concepts have some interesting parts as well. If the Peco prices made your eyes water be prepared for a waterfall. Worthwhile investing in Fast Tracks point and blade jigs if you plan on doing a lot. Niagara Falls pricing (which is apt as they are upstream from the falls). I've used a lot of C+L components, as well as their flex track, I use SMP EM flex track, and I use Fast Tracks jigs. No association with any of them (taking my money excepted). I switched to EM gauge for my GWR projects several years ago, mainly out of frustration with trying to make OO track look decent. I would have gone to P4 but most RTR locomotives require a lot of (expensive) work when compared to EM. The fundamental issue with any of this track is that to-scale sleepers and spacing looks decidedly odd with the under-gauged OO scale rails. I know C+L OO flex has better sleeper spacing and length, but is still not quite to scale. The SMP EM track I use would look very odd with OO gauge rails. Compromises, compromises. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Simonflj55 Full Member
My photos:
|
Marcway provide a bespoke building service as well as some point kits. Making points isn't everyones idea of fun but you can at least build what you want rather than rely on the manufacturer supplied ones.
____________________ Oh well back to the asylum |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
BCDR Moderator
My photos:
|
Simon, Hits the nail. If you can solder a rail dropper you can build a turnout. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger
My photos:
|
Hurrow! Grateful for input, on camp-site wi-fi, will reply soon, Doug ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger
My photos:
|
Thank you all for your input, I am seriously looking at Marcway OO Bullhead flexi-track and ready-rolled pointwork. http://www.marcway.net/list3.php?col=head&name=SCALEWAY+TRACK The smallest turnouts are 36" radius, which I think equates to Peco medium pointwork and cost £108 for an introductory offer of 4 turnouts. Their 36" flexi-track is £39.50 for a box of 10 so not that expensive. I have yet to talk to them about compatability with the Peco stuff I have, which fishplates/joiners etc..are suitable and if changeover track units are available. That's all for now, decisions, decisions... Douglas ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
BCDR Moderator
My photos:
|
Hi Doug, Compatibility between code 100 and code 75 can be an issue. The other issue is that Markway sleepers (and C+L as well) are thinner than offerings from Peco, so some packing will be required where they meet. Bonus is that you would use about 25% of the ballast required for Peco track.There are joiners for code 100 to 75 F/H. I am not aware of joiners specifically for bullhead rail. (But then I don't use them on the EM track anyway, just cosmetic fish plates). I just tried some code 70 joiners on the Markway code 75 track. Works a treat. Code 83 ones were a bit loose, and code 100 very loose. Peco OOn9 joiners or N gauge joiners (code 70) should be fine. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Campaman Full Member 
My photos:
|
I have joined code 100 to code 75 by sliding the rail joiner onto the code 100 rail, then flatten the protruding bit in plyers and then solder the code 75 on top of flattened bit of the joiner.
____________________ Cheers Andy |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
pnwood DON'T SHOUT my hearing is fine 
My photos:
|
Had a chat with a Peco guy on their stand at the Derby show recently. They had pre-production samples of a diamond crossing, single slip, double slip and medium radius points. The slips are due late autumn this year and the points early 2020. I asked why they had released large radius points first and not the more popular medium radius he replied that they thought the bullhead rail track would appeal to finer scale modellers and that they would want the larger radius points too. Peco obviously didn't do much market research before making the decision. ____________________ Nick AKA Woody ------- Much Murkle GWR a layout in the making Much Murkle website |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger
My photos:
|
pnwood wrote: Peco obviously didn't do much market research before making the decision. Yup. I expect the Acme Sealing Wax Co. Ltd. went under, continuing to release new colours of sealing wax... Those living comfortably at the top of the executive tree probably have no conception of space constraints of ordinary mortals. For a very small retainer I'd gladly be co-opted onto their research facility to give a more balance view of the needs of the average overweight, grey-haired miserable old barsteward who I seem to meet at most shows. Douglas [I must not eat acid-drops for breakfast, I must not eat acid-drops for breakfast, I must n.....] ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
col.stephens Full Member
My photos:
|
Chubber wrote: pnwood wrote:Peco obviously didn't do much market research before making the decision.
Terry |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
BCDR Moderator
My photos:
|
pnwood wrote: Had a chat with a Peco guy on their stand at the Derby show recently. They had pre-production samples of a diamond crossing, single slip, double slip and medium radius points. The slips are due late autumn this year and the points early 2020. Looks like a case of "Peco knows best". Their code 83 F/B in contrast has a better range of points with real frog numbers (#5-#8), slips, a wye, even cross overs. Unfortunately not everything is available in either electro- or insul-, so it's mix and match. The better Peco range is I suspect because of the more comprehensive RTR ranges already offered in the US by Atlas, Walthers (Shinohara) or Micro Engineering. All of which can be used together. The Walthers range covers #4 to #10 frogs for example. Plus wyes, cross overs (diamonds) and even a three way. And a code 100 to code 83 bridging track. Which makes it easy using code 100 for the fiddle yard and code 83 for the scenic bits. It took Atlas over 10 years to introduce a reasonable range, and that was with a very much bigger market. With a diminishing UK market proportion using bulk head and an increasing proportion using flat bottomed modern image track it could well be an orphan range. Especially as fine scale modelers (a very small market place) move quickly into EM or P4 and hand laid track of code 70-75 as soon as they realize the many issues with RTR track and points. Just lay a section of Peco code 75 next to C+L or Markway track. Or compare the pressed metal hollow point blades used by Peco with the solid rail blades used by others. Or the one frog fits all in small, medium and large radius points. Which is designed to work with radius 1-3 set track So actually it is pretty smart marketing. 4mm scale stock running on 3.5mm scale track is primarily a UK-only market. If you ever come across Graham Farish RTR OO track (not points) you will see what could have been done years ago (it was my Damascus moment that eventually lead me to EM). Peco HO/OO track set the standard for many years. Difficult to get away from the philosophy behind it. Kudos to Peco for even trying. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Ben Alder Full Member 
My photos:
|
I have used a combination of C&L track and Peco Code 75 pointwork to date, with the points trimmed about at the throat end to get rid of the gubbins that detracts from appearance and added cosmetic C&L chairs cut in half to keep the bullhead look. Here is a pic of how it turned out. And the alterations to the switch end.  ch |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
BCDR Moderator
My photos:
|
Ben's two pictures show the differences between Peco and C+L sleepers. With the dummy half chairs added the difference between B/H and F/B rail is hardly noticeable. Nigel ____________________ ©Nigel C. Phillips |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Ben Alder Full Member
My photos:
|
Just for the sake of completeness, here is a pic of two of the Peco bullhead points I fitted in the goods yard as a trial. They do look better than my modified Code 75 ones, but to the eye the modified ones blend in with the plain track well. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger
My photos:
|
Terry, too many acid drops? Tee Hee! Ben, thank you for those posts, the BH points do look good. Chopping away some of the extra plastic on the Peco offerings is a good idea, I have 4 curved points, still in their boxes which it sems shame to waste. Always a pleasure to see your layout. Douglas ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Petermac Moderator 
My photos:
|
That is stunning trackwork Richard.  ____________________ 'Petermac |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Ben Alder Full Member
My photos:
|
Thanks, but it's straight out of the box C&L and the new Peco points. It does show the massive improvement "proper" 00 track make compared to the HO that is marketed as the standard. It is something that has rankled with me a bit, watching the marvellous advances in almost all aspects of 4mm offerings this last two decades while trackwork has remained static, apart from Peco in a small way with Code 75, but still HO, since Hornby brought out their System 6 in the early seventies. I would like to think that this is the start of a big catch up... |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Chubber Casseroled Badger
My photos:
|
Well, I finally spoke to Peco this afternoon, and the way in which I was spoken to confirms that even if I've got to buy only one turnout per month I'm going to buy Marcway turnuts and SMP flexitrack. When I asked what the marketing thoughts were behind the LR points, single slip and long crossing I was vitually told that that is what they were asked for and that as the range was intended for people who wanted realism [the inference was 'Real Modellers'] then they would not be making BH turnouts in anything approaching small radius, and that they would be looking at producuing the slip and crossing at the end of this year and perhaps medium radius next year, maybe, possibly, if you can wait, take it or lump it.....Oh, I nearly forgot, 'Joining FB to the new BH?' - 'squeeze on a FB joiner'... They make a Code 75 - Code 100 transition rail, but won't be doing anything similar for FB/BH. So, as posted previously, really. Doug ____________________ 'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin In the land of the slap-dash and implausible, mediocrity is king |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is topic ID = 16084 Current time is 10:21 pm |
| You are here: Your Model Railway Club > Getting You Started. > The Lineside. > Is it me? Peco 16.5mm Bullhead track...where's the rest of the kit? | |||
|
You can type a quick reply to this topic here. Click in the box below to begin. Or to reply to an individual post, or to include images, attachments and formatted text, click the Quote or Reply buttons on each post above. To start a new topic in this forum, click the Start New Topic button below. To start a new topic in a different forum, click the Forum Jump drop-down list below. |
|
||
|
Back to top of page | ||
| |||
| Problems with this web site? Please contact the Webmaster. | |||
| All material submitted to this web site is the responsibility of the respective contributor. By submitting material to this web site you acknowledge that you accept full responsibility for the material submitted. |
| Unless stated otherwise, all the material displayed on this web site, including all text, photographs, drawings and other images, is copyright and the property of the respective contributor. Registered members are welcome to use it for their own personal non-commercial modelmaking purposes. It must not be reproduced or re-published elsewhere in any form, or used commercially, without first obtaining the owner's express permission. |
| The owner of this web site may edit, modify or remove any content at any time without giving notice or reason. © 2008 |
| Recent Topics | Back to top of page | |
|
Powered by Copyright © 2007-2011 by Jim Hale and Data 1 Systems. Page design copyright © 2008-2013 Martin Wynne. Photo gallery copyright © 2009 David Williams. |
||