Video Archive         Recent Topics      
YMR logo

You are here:  Your Model Railway Club > Model Railway Layouts. > Small Layouts,Planks and Micros > The art of compromise. To bottom of page
                 

 Moderated by: Spurno Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6   
Start New Topic Reply Printer Friendly

The art of compromise. - Small Layouts,Planks and Micros - Model Railway Layouts. - Your Model Railway Club
AuthorPost
 Posted: Fri Apr 5th, 2019 05:15 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 101st post
col.stephens
Full Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 7th, 2012
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2186
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

The layout plods slowly on.  Today I visited the local wood merchant and bought enough 4mm thick plywood for the backscene, end pieces, and pelmet, which the chap very kindly cut to size for me.


Returning to the theme mentioned in the 64th post, I want to give the impression that the track going under the bridge actually goes somewhere and not just straight into the fiddle yard.  To this end, it will be necessary to restrict the view into said fiddle yard.  I cut a hole in the newly acquired ply end panel and propped it up behind the bridge.  I took some photos from the spectators' viewpoints along the front of the layout to get an idea how far one could see into the fiddle yard.  They look something like this...




This is roughly the area which would need to be developed in order to give the impression I am hoping to achieve...



As a start, I have painted the whole area with brown/grey acrylic paint.


Before any scenic work can progress on the layout, the backscene panels now require fixing in place.


Terry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Fri Apr 5th, 2019 06:11 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 102nd post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 3558
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Terry. Well done. It isnโ€™t as though any efforts of mine are going anywhere l until I RIP and most likely then to the place where old horses go. But I am working along the same lines, except by necessity,  for the fact that I have chosen a tunnel.Nigel has pointed me in the correct direction with the walls of a cutting, to keep prying eyes ๐Ÿ‘€ out. Anyway it is all fun as long as you enjoy what you are doing. Best wishes Kevin 



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Fri Apr 5th, 2019 08:51 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 103rd post
Petermac
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Nr Bergerac, France
Posts: 16786
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

That looks very neat Terry - I do like the tunnel portal. :thumbs

No doubt a bit late now but, instead of a sloping wall on the fiddle yard side, I wonder if a level one would hide more plus, putting a roof on it would make a proper "tunnel" effect and almost completely hide anything in the yard. :hmm



____________________
'Petermac
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 12:43 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 104th post
ZeldaTheSwordsman
Madman


Joined: Fri Jan 15th, 2016
Location: Pomona, California USA
Posts: 582
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Using a tunnel to hide the fiddle yard is a good idea; I've seen it done before and it's quite effective.



____________________
My workbench, AKA an exercise in insanity
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 06:16 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 105th post
col.stephens
Full Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 7th, 2012
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2186
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Thank you all for your constructive comments.  However, you all appear to have misunderstood what I am aiming to achieve.  It is a bridge, not a tunnel.  I could enclose the fiddleyard side in a 'tunnel' or 'tube' but that will not give the effect I am after.  The impression I am aiming for is that the track and scenery continue on the other side of the bridge. 
Regards to all,


Terry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 09:07 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 106th post
Petermac
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Nr Bergerac, France
Posts: 16786
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:  Ooops .........................



____________________
'Petermac
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 10:46 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 107th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 3558
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

:oops::oops::oops: Oops indeed Petermac.   Best wishes Kevin 



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 05:36 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 108th post
Barchester
Administrator


Joined: Wed Oct 18th, 2017
Location: Linlithgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 426
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Clever idea Terry, we often see a tunnel or the track disappearing through a building, but not often a backscene incorporating a bridge. I take it the trick will be matching the scenic through the bridge to that on the backscene ? 
 My only thought is weather the  buttress in the fiddle yard should be angled the same as those on the viewing side. . . Or weather it would make a blind bit of difference ! :hmm

Cheers

Matt

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 08:15 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 109th post
col.stephens
Full Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 7th, 2012
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2186
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

As you can see in the photos in post 101, I have placed the wing wall on the fiddle yard side almost parallel to the track.  This does help to restrict the view.  In the final analysis, I may angle it slightly away from the track and include a bit more embankment.   However, this will all take place a bit further down the line.


In the meantime, this arrived yesterday...



And here's the rub... I had intended to model the layout as a BR London Midland offering, of which I actually know very little.  There are numerous BR layouts on the exhibition circuit but not so many set in the pre-nationalisation era.  I am minded to use this model as an opportunity to do something different and have a dip into the Brighton Section of the Southern Railway.  Some of the rolling stock may have to be scratchbuilt but that would just be a case of renewing old skills.  I have, in the past, built many wagons in both 4mm and 7mm scales.  To date, not many buildings for the layout have been completed and it would mean building the station building again (for the third time!)


Views would be welcomed.


Terry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sat Apr 6th, 2019 11:06 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 110th post
Barry Miltenburg
Full Member


Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 414
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Terry

As a modeller of the BR era late 1950's - early 1960's steam/diesel transition I am aware that there are literally hundreds of modellers like me covering this same period.  Back in the day I modelled pre-grouping MR partly out of a love of Johnson engines and partly on the back of Peter Denny's philosophy that an obscure subject would attract less critique as fewer people were experts - and it worked for a while!

These days, pre-grouping layouts are rare and pre-nationalisation layouts are uncommon.  The trends seem to follow the lead given by the big manufacturers and their output.  If there is a bit of a run of ex-LNER locomotives released, a volley of ex-LNER layouts never seems to be far behind etc etc.

The idea of LMS or SR is a good one - colour, railway heyday, variety of rolling stock etc.  I don't have an interest in either company but can appreciate your fondness for lovely little things like the Terrier.  I say Go For It!!

Barry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Apr 21st, 2019 07:12 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 111th post
col.stephens
Full Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 7th, 2012
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2186
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

After the overwhelming response (thanks Barry!) to my suggestion that the layout be modelled as the Southern Railway, my thoughts have been going in two directions.  Firstly, I have to finish the woodwork before proceeding with the scenery.  Secondly, I will have to build a couple of ex-LBSC carriages from scratch.  Etched brass kits are available at a price.  I don't do brass, lacking the necessary skills.  I like plastic.  It's easy to work and mistakes can be rectified quite easily.  In any event, I like the challenge of building my own carriages and solving the problems (not issues) as they arise, rather than having a kit designer doing it all for me.


So, this thread is going to continue with the layout build and the carriage build will start on a new thread.  Hopefully, in time, the completed carriages will join us here.


Back to the layout.  Not much done recently but today I decided to start adding the boards which support the backscene . Firstly, I thought that I would tackle the board which separates the scenic section from the fiddle yard.  Keeping this board upright has always been a problem for me.  For instance, the boards along the rear of the layout are simply screwed to the outside of the baseboard frame, as is the small board at the end of the scenic section.  But the board separating the scenic section and the fiddle yard is sitting on top of the baseboard surface, therefore no frame to screw it to.  Fortunately, there will be a road and embankment at this end of the layout so here is my solution to keep the board upright...



Three wooden blocks are fitted each side of the bridge.  The bottom block is screwed into the end frame beneath the baseboard surface, and each block is screwed onto the piece below.  Screws are driven into the wooden blocks from the fiddle yard side and all is secure.  The blocks will eventually be hidden beneath the road and embankment.



More soon.


Terry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Apr 22nd, 2019 07:54 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 112th post
Ed
Full Member


Joined: Tue Jan 29th, 2013
Location: West Anglia Main Line, United Kingdom
Posts: 3712
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Don't know if these coaches are any good Terry, probably wrong era.

http://smallbrookstudio.co.uk/kits-parts/4569521210/4mm-IoW-Southern


Ed



____________________
Engineers just love to change things
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Apr 22nd, 2019 03:16 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 113th post
col.stephens
Full Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 7th, 2012
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2186
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Yes, I saw those Ed.  I believe the 4-wheelers had been withdrawn before the 1930's.  Bogie coaches are required.  Just about to start a new thread.  Thanks for your interest.


Terry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Thu Jun 20th, 2019 08:51 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 114th post
Barry Miltenburg
Full Member


Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 414
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Terry

Any chance of an update on the Art of Compromise project - there are lots of us interested!!

Barry

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Thu Jun 20th, 2019 09:32 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 115th post
Headmaster
Full Member


Joined: Sun Jun 2nd, 2013
Location: Faversham, United Kingdom
Posts: 757
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

There are indeed!!!

Best title for a thread I've seen, too...

Michael



____________________
Michael

Faversham Creek

"There is no harm in repeating a good thing." Plato
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Thu Jun 20th, 2019 10:38 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 116th post
Colin W
Full Member


Joined: Thu May 2nd, 2019
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 76
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Terry,


Regarding your Post #82

I'm late to this Topic but regarding getting colour consistency, I use a lot of Scalescenes papers and get them printed at my local Office Supplies on quality paper of the appropriate weight. At around the equivalent of 35 pence for an A4 200GSM sheet I reckon its very good value. You can see some results on my topic or gallery (sorry - shameless plug!)

They have good QC so I've found the colour is reliable. Their dyes are reasonably light fast but I do coat with a matt UV varnish once installed. In comparison, home ink jet applications can be quite variable and (I think) less UV stable. The cost of professional printing has dropped so much it doesn't warrant all the fussing over maintaining your own hardware, not to mention the consumables. Consequently, colour home printing is one technology bullet I've managed to completely dodge!

Colin







____________________
Colin
Westown - Heathfield,
Steam on the GWR
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

This is topic ID = 15905     Current time is 02:07 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6     
You are here:  Your Model Railway Club > Model Railway Layouts. > Small Layouts,Planks and Micros > The art of compromise.
You can type a quick reply to this topic here. Click in the box below to begin.

Or to reply to an individual post, or to include images, attachments and formatted text,
click the Quote or Reply buttons on each post above.

To start a new topic in this forum, click the Start New Topic button below.
To start a new topic in a different forum, click the Forum Jump drop-down list below.
Start New Topic


Back to top of page

           
15 Most Recent Topics

Problems with this web site? Please contact the Webmaster.

All material submitted to this web site is the responsibility of the respective contributor. By submitting material to this web site you acknowledge that you accept full responsibility for the material submitted.
Unless stated otherwise, all the material displayed on this web site, including all text, photographs, drawings and other images, is copyright and the property of the respective contributor. Registered members are welcome to use it for their own personal non-commercial modelmaking purposes. It must not be reproduced or re-published elsewhere in any form, or used commercially, without first obtaining the owner's express permission.
The owner of this web site may edit, modify or remove any content at any time without giving notice or reason.    © 2008

                 

Recent Topics Back to top of page

Powered by UltraBB 1.15 Copyright © 2007-2011 by Jim Hale and Data 1 Systems. Page design copyright © 2008-2013 Martin Wynne. Photo gallery copyright © 2009 David Williams.