Video Archive         Recent Topics      
YMR logo

You are here:  Your Model Railway Club > Getting You Started. > Layout Design, Trackwork & Operation. > Trackwork and operation To bottom of page
                 

 Moderated by: Spurno Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
Start New Topic Reply Printer Friendly

Trackwork and operation - Layout Design, Trackwork & Operation. - Getting You Started. - Your Model Railway Club
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 03:26 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 1st post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Happy New Year. All.   I Had read about a “possible fault”? With Peco points, and lo and behold a set of points had developed a “Hump” at the frog causing a “Step in the Track” , but I had already removed the spring to prevent that “Snap action” you get when the points are thrown , which was likely to invalidate any guarantee . Having already considered building my own points? I read a interesting piece online about a Modeller that had replaced the plastic sleepers with PCB on Peco points, A bit “over the top” ? But with the Peco hump in mind I thought that may be worth a go? With nothing to lose except the cost of the PCB sleepers.   Please advise.   Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 04:11 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 2nd post
Sol
A modelling Moderator.


Joined: Mon Nov 28th, 2011
Location: Evanston Gardens, South Aust, Australia
Posts: 3530
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Kevin, the Peco hump is easily fixed by using a track pin though a sleeper near the frog & into the baseboard to hold the "hump" down until ballasted  and to improve the look of Peco, read this
https://www.dccconcepts.com/manual/making-peco-better.


and by looking into YMR Index
http://yourmodelrailway.net/view_topic.php?id=793&forum_id=46

under Points- you will find a few tips, etc



____________________
Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 04:13 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 3rd post
Sol
A modelling Moderator.


Joined: Mon Nov 28th, 2011
Location: Evanston Gardens, South Aust, Australia
Posts: 3530
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

And yes remove the spring if using Tortoise/Cobalt turnouts motors  or mechanical methods like slide switches, etc but for solenoids - Peco type, leave them in so the blades are kept in contact with the stock rail.



____________________
Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 06:09 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 4th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Ron Thank you for your reply. The “hump” in the point i am referring to, makes the point look a bit like a banana?and the step in in the Rail is really to much for stock to handle. I will read the notes. When I removed the spring/ s from the points, the “ wire inTube” copes with the gap with the stock rail.  Best wishes. Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 06:17 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 5th post
BCDR
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 19th, 2013
Location: Reston, Virginia USA
Posts: 2474
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Kevin,

Send it back, the spring is a user replaceable item and has nothing to do with the hump. It should not void the warranty. Sounds like dodgy plastic sleepers contracting.

Replace the sleepers with copper clad or pcb? Doable, especially if one gets broken, but why not just build your own? I can't imagine why you would to replace all of them. Unless it's to make it look more to scale, which is always a compromise and a losing battle because scale sleepers and spacing just looks weird (the narrow gauge track on full size spacing/sleeper issue). Peco track is HO track, even their new "OO" range. Do you have a link to the article?

Nigel
Edit. Found the thread on RMweb. 



____________________
©Nigel C. Phillips
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 06:23 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 6th post
Brossard
Member


Joined: Sat Jul 23rd, 2011
Location: Brossard, Quebec Canada
Posts: 2959
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

I've remanufactured old Peco turnouts by stripping away the plastic timbers and recovering the two stock rails, blades and closure rails.  Because of the way the crossing and vee are embedded in the plastic moulding, these cannot be recovered.  Therefore, these must be made by the modeller.  Copper clad strip can be used to reconstruct the turnout.

This is a good method if you need a turnout that is a non standard radius.

You'll need roller gauges (DCC Concepts from Gaugemaster I think and this: http://www.doubleogauge.com/shop.htm ) and templates - there are a couple of programs; Templot.(free to download) and Trax2 (my preference because it is easier than Templot but you might find it hard to find - it consists of a very good instructional book and CD).

John



____________________
John

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 06:34 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 7th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Happy New Year Nigel , thank you. Returning stuff is okay when one can remember where (and when)it came from ,but in this instant I cannot. As far as making points is concerned I thought that “ if I could repair this set” then it would give me an idea what to expect. And maybe while I am at it? get the Sleeper  vital statistics correct , whatever they are?    Best wishes. Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2018 06:48 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 8th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Happy New Year.  John and thank you.    As far as downloading is concerned , I need to sort out my laptop, as it isn’t very “PC” at the moment, and when it is, it is ? it doesn’t talk to my printer in the same laguage. I do however have both roller and back to back gauges.  Best wishes. Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 12:22 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 9th post
BCDR
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 19th, 2013
Location: Reston, Virginia USA
Posts: 2474
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Kevin,

8' 6" or 9' long. This topic has been discussed many times, scaling even 8'6" for 4mm/OO looks to many eyes a bit silly.  
Make sure your rollers/gauges are suitable for the rail code, finer codes usually have a narrower rail head. If your points are correctly wired for DCC now is the time to reduce the gap between the point blades and the outside rails. Peco uses a very wide gap because of the power routing design design. 

Nigel



____________________
©Nigel C. Phillips
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 01:44 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 10th post
Sol
A modelling Moderator.


Joined: Mon Nov 28th, 2011
Location: Evanston Gardens, South Aust, Australia
Posts: 3530
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

And Kevin, this is just one site selling track & turnout parts
https://www.dccconcepts.com/product-category/track-and-track-making-parts/dccconcepts-track-and-track-making-parts/


and this    http://www.finescale.org.uk/



____________________
Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 02:20 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 11th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Nigel Thank you for your reply. so that means the difference of “2 mm over a Sleeper” that would hardly be noticeable ? In comparison to your thread about the spacing between the sleepers, which would over a length oftrack make a noticeable difference and be worth doing, at the outset,  but not a good idea to lift all the track and start again. My roller gauges are ade for OO. Best wishes. Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 02:38 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 12th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Ron. Thank you.   At the moment I am still considering my next move. I now have the #146 Couplers from  Gaugemaster , they are a better proposition than the #5’s. I seem to be bogged down with jobs to do? I really need to get myself organised. I think I need a “Tome Table”, not just get up and have breakfast. But Get you Finger Out, and do something , it is too easy to loll about all day.   Best wishes. Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 02:43 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 13th post
Chubber
Casseroled Badger


Joined: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008
Location: Ivybridge, Devon, Gateway To Dartmoor.. , United Kingdom
Posts: 4457
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Does the use of isopropyl alcohol as a wetting agent have anything to do with this? (When ballasting)

I ask because I recently degreased a sleeve around a broken radio tuning knob with ISO.A to repair same (I dropped my trusty Panasonic transistor radio of some 40 years vintage) and the sleeve and shafts swelled up so much I needed to drill it out....

Jus' thinkin',

Doug



____________________
'You may share the labours of the great, but you will not share the spoil...' Aesop's Fables

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin

Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 03:30 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 14th post
BCDR
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 19th, 2013
Location: Reston, Virginia USA
Posts: 2474
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Kevin

8'6" in metric (4mm to the foot) is 34mm. Which is what my EM track is with a gauge of 18.2mm (which is a tad undersized compared to P4 at 18.84mm). Peco track is I believe 28mm, with a gauge of 16.5mm. This has 7.7mm of sleeper outside the rails on each side (almost the same as P4). Lay 16.5mm gauge track on scale real size sleepers and it really does look odd - there is too much sleeper at either side of the rails - 8.75mm. That couple of mm makes a difference. C+L Finescale OO track comprises by having the length I think of 30mm.  Increasing the inter-sleeper spacing makes a better looking track than increasing the length of the sleepers.

Nigel



____________________
©Nigel C. Phillips
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 04:24 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 15th post
Sol
A modelling Moderator.


Joined: Mon Nov 28th, 2011
Location: Evanston Gardens, South Aust, Australia
Posts: 3530
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Kevin, following  on from Nigels' comments about spacing, have a read about the new Peco track

https://www.pecopublications.co.uk/peco-anounces-2016-new-items-programme.html



____________________
Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 10:25 am
PMQuoteReply
link to this 16th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Happy New Year Doug . Thank you. The particular set of points which I began this thread with has not been near Ballasting  I believe that it is a well known.fact with Peco points. Something to do with the plastic being unable to contain the expansion or whatever of the metal. And if I knew this fact Fifty Years ago I may not having begun this thread .   Best wishes.  Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 12:15 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 17th post
Sol
A modelling Moderator.


Joined: Mon Nov 28th, 2011
Location: Evanston Gardens, South Aust, Australia
Posts: 3530
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Kevin,  NOT all Peco points are bowed in the middle....

and those that are, are easily fixed/repaired.



____________________
Ron
NCE DCC ; 00 scale UK outline.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 12:29 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 18th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Ron.    Thank you . I hope not too, as all of my points are by Peco , fingers crossed, AFAIK .it was just an idea to resarect a bowed set and add another “ Striing to my Bow?”   Best wishes  Kevin 



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 05:04 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 19th post
BCDR
Moderator


Joined: Sat Oct 19th, 2013
Location: Reston, Virginia USA
Posts: 2474
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

Hi Kevin,

Have a go at adding copper-clad sleepers, I bet you will be building your own shortly afterwards. Especially if you start using the new Peco OO track or even better C+L track if it's available.

One thing to note is that turnouts have wider timbers than track. Devil's in the details.

Nigel



____________________
©Nigel C. Phillips
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

 Posted: Mon Jan 8th, 2018 06:18 pm
PMQuoteReply
link to this 20th post
Passed Driver
Full Member


Joined: Thu Feb 19th, 2015
Location: Peckham, United Kingdom
Posts: 2193
Status: 
Offline

My photos:
view photos in Gallery
view photos as slides

BCDR wrote:Hi Kevin,

Have a go at adding copper-clad sleepers, I bet you will be building your own shortly afterwards. Especially if you start using the new Peco OO track or even better C+L track if it's available.

One thing to note is that turnouts have wider timbers than track. Devil's in the details.

Nigel
Hi Nigel    Thank you. This new Peco OO  Track ??, That you mentioned as good or bad as it is? I have a lot of the “Old Style” flat bottom rail that is still “ Virgin Territory” . Where I read ? that the new stuff is Bull Head, if that is correct? How do they marry up , and would you want to??Best wishes.   Kevin



____________________
Staying on the thread Kevin.
Back To Top PMQuoteReply

This is topic ID = 15353     Current time is 09:02 am Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
You are here:  Your Model Railway Club > Getting You Started. > Layout Design, Trackwork & Operation. > Trackwork and operation
You can type a quick reply to this topic here. Click in the box below to begin.

Or to reply to an individual post, or to include images, attachments and formatted text,
click the Quote or Reply buttons on each post above.

To start a new topic in this forum, click the Start New Topic button below.
To start a new topic in a different forum, click the Forum Jump drop-down list below.
Start New Topic


Back to top of page

           
15 Most Recent Topics

Problems with this web site? Please contact the Webmaster.

All material submitted to this web site is the responsibility of the respective contributor. By submitting material to this web site you acknowledge that you accept full responsibility for the material submitted.
Unless stated otherwise, all the material displayed on this web site, including all text, photographs, drawings and other images, is copyright and the property of the respective contributor. Registered members are welcome to use it for their own personal non-commercial modelmaking purposes. It must not be reproduced or re-published elsewhere in any form, or used commercially, without first obtaining the owner's express permission.
The owner of this web site may edit, modify or remove any content at any time without giving notice or reason.    © 2008

                 

Recent Topics Back to top of page

Powered by UltraBB 1.15 Copyright © 2007-2011 by Jim Hale and Data 1 Systems. Page design copyright © 2008-2013 Martin Wynne. Photo gallery copyright © 2009 David Williams.